A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Thursday deadline for federal employees to accept the Trump administration’s deferred resignation offer, allowing more legal proceedings to determine the program’s validity.
Government Pauses Resignation Offer Pending Legal Review
The administration will now issue a notice to federal workers, informing them that the resignation deadline has been put on hold.
Prior to this decision, eligible employees had until 11:59 p.m. ET on Thursday to decide whether to take the Trump administration’s offer. This program would have permitted employees to leave their jobs while continuing to receive pay until the end of September.
Legal Challenge by Federal Unions
The pause follows a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and several other unions. The unions are seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent the February 6 deadline and are calling on the government to establish a lawful policy, rather than what they describe as an arbitrary and unenforceable ultimatum.
U.S. District Judge George O’Toole, a Clinton appointee based in Boston, stated during a brief hearing that the administration must refrain from implementing the plan while he reviews further legal briefings. A follow-up hearing has been scheduled for Monday afternoon.
Growing Concerns Among Federal Employees
Federal unions have strongly advised their members against accepting the package, raising questions about its legality and the administration’s ability to uphold its commitments.
Despite these concerns, an administration official disclosed that at least 50,000 federal employees have already opted into the resignation package.
Supervisors at various federal agencies have been briefing employees on the offer, answering questions, and in some cases, subtly encouraging them to accept it.
Sweeping Workforce Reduction Initiative
The resignation package is part of the Trump administration’s broader strategy to significantly reduce the size of the federal workforce, presenting employees with difficult choices about their careers and financial security.
A spokesperson from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) described the offer as a “rare, generous opportunity.” However, it comes with a stark warning: those who decline could be at risk of losing their jobs. According to administration officials, widespread layoffs are planned shortly.
Of the two million federal employees who received the incentive, the administration aims to secure resignations from 5% to 10% of the workforce.
Implications for Federal Workers
Certain categories of federal employees—including military personnel, immigration enforcement officers, key national security staffers, and National Transportation Safety Board employees—are not eligible for the offer. However, CIA personnel are included.
For older workers, the administration has introduced an early retirement incentive known as the Voluntary Early Retirement Authority (VERA). To qualify, employees must be at least 50 years old with a minimum of 20 years of service or any age with at least 25 years of service.
Confusion and Controversy Surrounding the Offer
The resignation offer was sent to federal employees on January 28 through the administration’s new mass email system. The subject line, “Fork in the Road,” closely resembled a message sent by Twitter (now X) to its employees following Elon Musk’s takeover.
This email triggered widespread confusion, concern, and frustration among federal workers. OPM later posted an FAQ on its website and sent a follow-up email clarifying that employees who accept the offer will not be required to continue working, with some exceptions.
However, a subsequent OPM memo revealed inconsistencies, stating that individual agencies have the discretion to require employees to work for a portion of the deferred resignation period.
Union Leaders Criticize the Administration
Union leaders continue to push back against the administration’s approach. The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) has already raised concerns about IRS employees being required to work until May 15 despite initially being told they would be paid to not work through September 30.
NTEU National President Doreen Greenwald condemned the administration’s handling of the offer, stating, “Not only is this a clear case of bait-and-switch, but it proves that the terms of OPM’s so-called offer are unreliable and cannot be trusted.”
Broader Federal Workforce Reforms
The Trump administration’s workforce reduction initiative is one of several measures aimed at restructuring federal employment. Other efforts include reducing civil service protections, replacing career employees with political appointees, and eliminating diversity programs.
Federal unions argue that these moves will weaken government services and harm American citizens.
AFGE National President Everett Kelley warned that if the administration’s efforts continue unchecked, lawmakers will soon face backlash from constituents struggling with delayed Social Security benefits and VA claims.
ALSO READ:
The legal battle over the deferred resignation offer is far from over, with the next court hearing scheduled for Monday. As federal employees await clarity, uncertainty looms over their job security and the future of the federal workforce.
What are your thoughts on the Trump administration’s approach to reshaping the federal workforce? Do you think this strategy will benefit or harm government efficiency? Share your opinions!